https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/07/no-benefits-for-alcoholic-who-drank-ethanol/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:33:37 +0000 hourly 1 https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/07/no-benefits-for-alcoholic-who-drank-ethanol/comment-page-1/#comment-3437 Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:33:37 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3691#comment-3437 I’d drink to that, Rob!

]]> https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/07/no-benefits-for-alcoholic-who-drank-ethanol/comment-page-1/#comment-3436 Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:09:47 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3691#comment-3436 Good call Rob!

]]> https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/07/no-benefits-for-alcoholic-who-drank-ethanol/comment-page-1/#comment-3435 Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:36:11 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3691#comment-3435 A .72 BAC. Wrap your mind around that, inasmuch as .40 is considered the standard lethal dose.

]]> https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/07/no-benefits-for-alcoholic-who-drank-ethanol/comment-page-1/#comment-3434 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:45:54 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3691#comment-3434 I’m thinking someone needs to be sued for naming their corn-base ethanol company “Amaizing Energy”

]]> https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/07/no-benefits-for-alcoholic-who-drank-ethanol/comment-page-1/#comment-3433 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:09:02 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3691#comment-3433 If the ethanol plant was to refuse to hire an alcoholic, would that be considered discrimination?

]]>