Comments on: Breaking: $105 million Aramark verdict reversed

By: Pat W

Pat W — Sun, 06 Aug 2006 15:45:03 +0000

DHMO is not the chemical symbol of Dihydrogen Monoxide. heh

By: LAN3

LAN3 — Sat, 05 Aug 2006 22:51:24 +0000

I hope the courts will finally use this opportunity to explore the role of Dihydrogen Monoxoide (DHMO) in this case. DHMO is a dangerous* chemical used in the manufacture of alcoholic beverages and is found in the bloodstream of 100% of drunk drivers who were tested.

By: SheetWise

SheetWise — Sat, 05 Aug 2006 11:05:59 +0000

And they let the cup manufacturer off? None of the defendants facilitated the drinking as directly as the cup manufacturer.

By: J.T. Wenting

J.T. Wenting — Sat, 05 Aug 2006 01:04:29 +0000

IOW the court decided that it wasn’t the claim that was unjust or the amount but the way it was spread out across the victims of the plaintiffs.

What the court should have decided is to reverse the decision and have plaintiffs pay that same amount to the people they sued…

By: John Rhodes

John Rhodes — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:38:02 +0000

"who committed the sin of drinking with Lanzano that day. &;quot;

I
LOVE that sentence. Yes, Jesus!