<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Deep pocket files: Wal-Mart on $4.2 million hook for carjacking	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/08/deep-pocket-files-wal-mart-on-42-million-hook-for-carjacking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/08/deep-pocket-files-wal-mart-on-42-million-hook-for-carjacking/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Collins		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/08/deep-pocket-files-wal-mart-on-42-million-hook-for-carjacking/comment-page-1/#comment-3714</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3809#comment-3714</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This looks like a pretty good tactic to me.  I hope it backfires, but I can&#039;t see how.  That big yellow smiley face seems to have become a bull&#039;s eye these days.  The only way I see to counter this would be to find out if the local Police have written any citations for Fire Lane and Handicap Parking Space violations at this store and use that to try to show that the local Police have some responsibility for security in the parking lot.

After reading the referenced article about Walmart&#039;s change in prosecuting shoplifting violations one thing bothers me.  Since when is our legal system supposed to be cost effective?  I have seen people let go because it would have cost too much to bring them to trial.  We have had several local Police forces disbanded because they didn&#039;t generate enough revenue to pay for themselves.  The local government in the article actually gripped about having to add an extra Police officer because of the Walmart store.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a pretty good tactic to me.  I hope it backfires, but I can&#8217;t see how.  That big yellow smiley face seems to have become a bull&#8217;s eye these days.  The only way I see to counter this would be to find out if the local Police have written any citations for Fire Lane and Handicap Parking Space violations at this store and use that to try to show that the local Police have some responsibility for security in the parking lot.</p>
<p>After reading the referenced article about Walmart&#8217;s change in prosecuting shoplifting violations one thing bothers me.  Since when is our legal system supposed to be cost effective?  I have seen people let go because it would have cost too much to bring them to trial.  We have had several local Police forces disbanded because they didn&#8217;t generate enough revenue to pay for themselves.  The local government in the article actually gripped about having to add an extra Police officer because of the Walmart store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Wilson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/08/deep-pocket-files-wal-mart-on-42-million-hook-for-carjacking/comment-page-1/#comment-3713</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Wilson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3809#comment-3713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The conservative columnist Sam Francis had a term for this:  &quot;anarcho-tyranny.&quot;  Anarcho-tyranny is a social condition by which the great crimes and criminals go unpunished, but minor crimes and even the innocent are punished instead. As if the society still has the need to &quot;punish&quot; someone or some thing, but for reasons of political correctness won&#039;t go after, say, carjackers and rapists, but will tuck into dog walkers and business owners. The latter have the benefit of being easy to catch and crush and because they actually abide by the rule of law enough to be subjected to its processes.

And so, Wal-Mart investors and shoppers are forced to foot the bill for the brazen criminal actions of others.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conservative columnist Sam Francis had a term for this:  &#8220;anarcho-tyranny.&#8221;  Anarcho-tyranny is a social condition by which the great crimes and criminals go unpunished, but minor crimes and even the innocent are punished instead. As if the society still has the need to &#8220;punish&#8221; someone or some thing, but for reasons of political correctness won&#8217;t go after, say, carjackers and rapists, but will tuck into dog walkers and business owners. The latter have the benefit of being easy to catch and crush and because they actually abide by the rule of law enough to be subjected to its processes.</p>
<p>And so, Wal-Mart investors and shoppers are forced to foot the bill for the brazen criminal actions of others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
