Comments on: Milk of RIAA’s kindness; “spamigation”

By: Deoxy

Deoxy — Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:22:23 +0000

“Ultimately, the RIAA is going to pick on the wrong defendant and get its head handed to it.”

SO? That would cost, what, $50,000? Maybe even $500,000? That wouldn’t be enough to get their attention.

This is yet anothr exampl of how badly we need “loser pays”.

By: Bill Evans

Bill Evans — Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:53:52 +0000

I personally would like to thank the RIAA for their continuing “Copyright Holy War”.

When I founded Boycott-riaa.com in 2001(since sold) I swore to not buy RIAA members music. Being a music fan who always has something playing in the background, I thought this would be difficult. However I soon discovered there is a wealth of independent music out there every bit as good, if not better, Less expensive, and the money goes to the musicians, not an international conglomerate.

Thank you RIAA for turning me on to independent music.

By: federalist

federalist — Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:15:07 +0000

Ultimately, the RIAA is going to pick on the wrong defendant and get its head handed to it.

By: WD

WD — Fri, 25 Aug 2006 04:39:22 +0000

For information concerning RIAA cases and status of various suits, you might want to take a peek at this site. http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/