Comments on: Bacardi responds to flaming-drinks suit https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/09/bacardi-responds-to-flaming-drinks-suit/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:44:33 +0000 hourly 1 By: Deoxy https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/09/bacardi-responds-to-flaming-drinks-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-4209 Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:05:37 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3986#comment-4209 “Do we really need to warn college frat partiers that putting a match to hard liquor causes flame?”

Yes, apparently, we do. Lawyers absolutely DEMAND (upon penalty of lawsuit) that we treat them as completely and utterly ignorant and devoid of any higher brain functions at all.

Insert related witty comment here – there are plenty to choose from.

]]> By: David https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/09/bacardi-responds-to-flaming-drinks-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-4208 Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:40:01 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3986#comment-4208 Question – do law students do Science 101?

]]> By: wavemaker https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/09/bacardi-responds-to-flaming-drinks-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-4207 Tue, 26 Sep 2006 06:23:36 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3986#comment-4207 Do we really need to warn college frat partiers that putting a match to hard liquor causes flame? Isn’t that covered in Science 101?

]]>