<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Posting podcasts? Apple&#8217;s lawyers are on line 1	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/09/posting-podcasts-apples-lawyers-are-on-line-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/09/posting-podcasts-apples-lawyers-are-on-line-1/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:01:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: JimBowe		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/09/posting-podcasts-apples-lawyers-are-on-line-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4245</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JimBowe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3999#comment-4245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Follow-up from Daring Fireball

Apple hasn’t said word one about tens of thousands of people using the term “podcast,” despite Apple’s “iPod” trademark and its claim on “Pod” as a portable audio player trademark as well. Apple took action against Podcast Ready because the firm, formerly known as Infostructure Solutions, was attempting to trademark the terms “Podcast Ready” and “MyPodder.” That would mean that other companies who wanted to use the term “podcast ready” would have to license it from Infostructure Solutions, even though the term is obviously and admittedly based on Apple’s “iPod” trademark. Apple cannot allow companies to register a variant on “myPod” as a trademark if it’s defending its own “iPod” trademark.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow-up from Daring Fireball</p>
<p>Apple hasn’t said word one about tens of thousands of people using the term “podcast,” despite Apple’s “iPod” trademark and its claim on “Pod” as a portable audio player trademark as well. Apple took action against Podcast Ready because the firm, formerly known as Infostructure Solutions, was attempting to trademark the terms “Podcast Ready” and “MyPodder.” That would mean that other companies who wanted to use the term “podcast ready” would have to license it from Infostructure Solutions, even though the term is obviously and admittedly based on Apple’s “iPod” trademark. Apple cannot allow companies to register a variant on “myPod” as a trademark if it’s defending its own “iPod” trademark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Bowe		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/09/posting-podcasts-apples-lawyers-are-on-line-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4244</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Bowe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3999#comment-4244</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As I understand it, Apple is suing because the company is attempting to register, &quot;podcast ready,&quot; or something similar.  Giving anyone other than Apple the rights to the words/phrase would create chaos, don&#039;t you think?

Jim
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I understand it, Apple is suing because the company is attempting to register, &#8220;podcast ready,&#8221; or something similar.  Giving anyone other than Apple the rights to the words/phrase would create chaos, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mojo		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/09/posting-podcasts-apples-lawyers-are-on-line-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4243</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mojo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3999#comment-4243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m waiting for them to sue all the whales and dolphins. Possibly all marine biologists, too.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting for them to sue all the whales and dolphins. Possibly all marine biologists, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Evans		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/09/posting-podcasts-apples-lawyers-are-on-line-1/comment-page-1/#comment-4242</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Evans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3999#comment-4242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wonder if Microsoft would have a problem with using the term Zunecast?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Microsoft would have a problem with using the term Zunecast?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
