Comments on: False accusations of “hypocrisy” II https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/11/false-accusations-of-hypocrisy-ii/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Wed, 28 May 2008 03:32:22 +0000 hourly 1 By: E-Bell https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/11/false-accusations-of-hypocrisy-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-4877 Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:59:19 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4235#comment-4877 I agree with Deoxy. The only comments I see with any regularity over at that site tend to be from the same folks who regularly comment on Overlawyered.

I bet this blog sends more traffic to TortDeform than any other referrer.

]]> By: Deoxy https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/11/false-accusations-of-hypocrisy-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-4876 Thu, 30 Nov 2006 10:47:32 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4235#comment-4876 “I would suggest that the writers at Lane’s site attempt to read and understand the reformers they purport to criticize, but that implies that they are interested in intellectual debate to reach an optimal public policy, rather than parroting the litigation lobby.”

Which is why I hav suggested that you simply ignore them. They are trolls, completely uninterested in actual debate or other intellctual excercise. They wear the outer look of dbate simply to get others to either believe them without argument or thought or to try to engage them, thus wasting their time.

When my 2-year-old decides the sky is green, I tll him that it’s not. When he repeats the assertion, I tell him that th rest of th world defines that color as blue. When he repeats the assertion, I ignore him.

]]>