<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Update: cosmetics class action settlement	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/11/update-cosmetics-class-action-settlement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/11/update-cosmetics-class-action-settlement/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:07:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: January 29 roundup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/11/update-cosmetics-class-action-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-39451</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[January 29 roundup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4213#comment-39451</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Free class-action swag if you bought department store cosmetics between 1994 and 2003; not that they&#8217;re giving away the very best stuff or anything [Tompkins/Poynter, California Civil Justice, WSJ Law Blog, settlement site] We&#8217;ve been covering the story for quite some time; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Free class-action swag if you bought department store cosmetics between 1994 and 2003; not that they&#8217;re giving away the very best stuff or anything [Tompkins/Poynter, California Civil Justice, WSJ Law Blog, settlement site] We&#8217;ve been covering the story for quite some time; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
