<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Candid Camera&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/01/candid-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/01/candid-camera/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 03:12:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/01/candid-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-5540</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4442#comment-5540</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.povonline.com/2003/News041503.htm#041503&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Evanier post on the topic&lt;/a&gt;.

Since Candid Camera viewers saw only the finished product, we don&#039;t know how many people refused to sign the release (just as we don&#039;t know how many people Borat interviewed and filmed who acquitted themselves honorably, so we never saw the tape).

A law firm I worked for years ago represented a network client that produced a prank show where the tasteless prank filmed for the pilot went awry, and the show was never aired.  There were lawsuits.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another <a href="http://www.povonline.com/2003/News041503.htm#041503" rel="nofollow">Evanier post on the topic</a>.</p>
<p>Since Candid Camera viewers saw only the finished product, we don&#8217;t know how many people refused to sign the release (just as we don&#8217;t know how many people Borat interviewed and filmed who acquitted themselves honorably, so we never saw the tape).</p>
<p>A law firm I worked for years ago represented a network client that produced a prank show where the tasteless prank filmed for the pilot went awry, and the show was never aired.  There were lawsuits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Walter E. Wallis		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/01/candid-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-5539</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter E. Wallis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4442#comment-5539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I never watched it after the first time. People who like to watch other people being humiliated are wierd. I often said I would watch one episode if the producers called Funt in and told him he was being fired.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never watched it after the first time. People who like to watch other people being humiliated are wierd. I often said I would watch one episode if the producers called Funt in and told him he was being fired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Captain Spaulding		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/01/candid-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-5538</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captain Spaulding]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4442#comment-5538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Commenters on Althouse say what I was going to say: On Candid Camera, you don&#039;t get asked to sign the release until after the embarrasing behavior in question whereas Borat had the release signed before.

Mark Evanier &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.povonline.com/2003/News040503.htm#041203&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;noted a couple of years ago&lt;/a&gt; that one way Candid Camera got releases signed was by a) deliberately avoiding pranks that would ensnare professionals and b) having his victims sent over by a temp agency.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commenters on Althouse say what I was going to say: On Candid Camera, you don&#8217;t get asked to sign the release until after the embarrasing behavior in question whereas Borat had the release signed before.</p>
<p>Mark Evanier <a href="http://www.povonline.com/2003/News040503.htm#041203" rel="nofollow">noted a couple of years ago</a> that one way Candid Camera got releases signed was by a) deliberately avoiding pranks that would ensnare professionals and b) having his victims sent over by a temp agency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Amsterdamsky		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/01/candid-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-5537</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amsterdamsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4442#comment-5537</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Agreed.  The were not primed to sue.  Something went rotton in the US since the early 70&#039;s.  If anything, prior to that people were not filing for these that really should have been sued for especially hosiptal induced harm in the name of health care.  1960&#039;s medical journals read like medieval torture documentation.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  The were not primed to sue.  Something went rotton in the US since the early 70&#8217;s.  If anything, prior to that people were not filing for these that really should have been sued for especially hosiptal induced harm in the name of health care.  1960&#8217;s medical journals read like medieval torture documentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jb		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/01/candid-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-5536</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4442#comment-5536</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The answer is the last one.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is the last one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KipEsquire		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/01/candid-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-5535</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KipEsquire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4442#comment-5535</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Did you guys cover the story in which the new version conspired with a small airport to trick people into riding a mock x-ray belt? That went to court (and to CourtTV), more to sue the airport than the producers of the show, as I recall.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.courttv.com/trials/taped/candidcamera/candidcamera_ctv.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.courttv.com/trials/taped/candidcamera/candidcamera_ctv.html&lt;/a&gt;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you guys cover the story in which the new version conspired with a small airport to trick people into riding a mock x-ray belt? That went to court (and to CourtTV), more to sue the airport than the producers of the show, as I recall.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.courttv.com/trials/taped/candidcamera/candidcamera_ctv.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.courttv.com/trials/taped/candidcamera/candidcamera_ctv.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
