Comments on: Nancy Grace (& lawprofs) on the Duke case https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/02/nancy-grace-lawprofs-on-the-duke-case/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:30:23 +0000 hourly 1 By: Jake https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/02/nancy-grace-lawprofs-on-the-duke-case/comment-page-1/#comment-5967 Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:30:23 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4546#comment-5967 The South Texas College of Law has for many years been a preeminent law school. The strident feminist law blog that STCL apparently tolerates gives one ample reason to think the law school has become cheap, a hostage to politically correct BS.

]]> By: William Nuesslein https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/02/nancy-grace-lawprofs-on-the-duke-case/comment-page-1/#comment-5966 Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:26:45 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4546#comment-5966 An eye witness account is evidence. But one eye witness may say the car was red and another that the car was blue. The science of eye witnessing is very fascinating.

DNA is another matter. There have been a number of exonerations based on DNA evidence, and people do not question DNA in paternity cases.

DNA is dispositive in the Duke case, and I am amassed that professors of law do not understand that.

The accuser should be judged by the content of her character, and not be a placeholder in one’s fantasies about race relations.

]]>