Comments on: That syllable is trademarked? D’oh!

By: Steve-O

Steve-O — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:21:47 +0000

this is an outrage! We should ban together and fight this!
Let’s get ready to rumble!!!

—

Oh, crap….sorry

Flemur — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 09:58:40 +0000

Dough!

jimbo — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:31:07 +0000

I guess I better get busy copywriting “The Flaming Moe” before Twentieth-Century Fox gets to it

Peter — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:23:04 +0000

Griffin3 has the right idea. A doubtless expensive trial has just been concluded that awarded the carmaker BMW the rights to... the letter M. http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/20/bmw-beats-infiniti-in-battle-over-m/

Erich — Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:56:24 +0000

You can trademark a grunt now? That’s absurd. What next? Belching like Homer?

That’s totally bogus, dude. I’m outta here. Eat my shorts.

schratboy — Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:53:02 +0000

I’m got the word Putz trademarked but there are so many applications I can’t keep them straight.

Captain Spaulding — Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:10:04 +0000

What does Jimmy Finlayson's estate say about that?

Griffin3 — Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:41:39 +0000

Hey, careful there, bud. Before you go mocking people’s intellectual property, let me warn you: I have a patent pending on the letter “e” …