<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Implausible claims in Texas	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/04/implausible-claims-in-texas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/04/implausible-claims-in-texas/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Nieporent		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/04/implausible-claims-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-6934</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Nieporent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4793#comment-6934</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ted, googling shows that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.accessiblesociety.org/topics/ada/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;another site&lt;/a&gt; claims that there were only 650 ADA suits in the &lt;b&gt;first&lt;/b&gt; five years of the law.  I still don&#039;t know whether that&#039;s true, but that&#039;s a lot more plausible.

All the other sites look like they copied this piece of information and dropped that qualification.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted, googling shows that <a href="http://www.accessiblesociety.org/topics/ada/index.html" rel="nofollow">another site</a> claims that there were only 650 ADA suits in the <b>first</b> five years of the law.  I still don&#8217;t know whether that&#8217;s true, but that&#8217;s a lot more plausible.</p>
<p>All the other sites look like they copied this piece of information and dropped that qualification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Justinian Lane		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/04/implausible-claims-in-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-6933</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justinian Lane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4793#comment-6933</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ted, is it possible that the 650 suits figure refers to suits filed by the DOJ?

I had the interesting experience of working with a DOJ lawyer - Hi Janine! - regarding a stubborn gym owner who blew the DOJ off for five years or so.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted, is it possible that the 650 suits figure refers to suits filed by the DOJ?</p>
<p>I had the interesting experience of working with a DOJ lawyer &#8211; Hi Janine! &#8211; regarding a stubborn gym owner who blew the DOJ off for five years or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
