<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Evolution and the legal client	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/evolution-and-the-legal-client/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/evolution-and-the-legal-client/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Zoe Brain		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/evolution-and-the-legal-client/comment-page-1/#comment-14118</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zoe Brain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 14:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/index.php/2007/05/evolution-and-the-legal-client/#comment-14118</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have. I work in the field of Artificial Intelligence.

We probably won&#039;t be faced with the prospect of artificial people this century. Probably. Time to think about these issues now, so we have just systems  in place when we need them.

It&#039;s just that every test we have for Personhood (when applied to a hypothetical AI) shows Forest and Bonibo chimps as being people, and even African Grey parrots as being thinking beings.

I live next to a halfway house for profoundly intellectually disabled people who happen to be human. They are people notwithstanding their inability to use symbols, or  make use of language. The average forest chimp is smarter. So how come killing Chimps painlessly is mere destruction of property, and not some form of felony?

I emphatically do not advocate withdrawing human rights from the intellectually disabled, young children etc. Neither do I advocate treating Chimpanzees as having the same rights as adult humans.

But very basic Person (rather than Human) rights, yes. Life. Liberty. The pursuit of happiness. That will do as a start.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have. I work in the field of Artificial Intelligence.</p>
<p>We probably won&#8217;t be faced with the prospect of artificial people this century. Probably. Time to think about these issues now, so we have just systems  in place when we need them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just that every test we have for Personhood (when applied to a hypothetical AI) shows Forest and Bonibo chimps as being people, and even African Grey parrots as being thinking beings.</p>
<p>I live next to a halfway house for profoundly intellectually disabled people who happen to be human. They are people notwithstanding their inability to use symbols, or  make use of language. The average forest chimp is smarter. So how come killing Chimps painlessly is mere destruction of property, and not some form of felony?</p>
<p>I emphatically do not advocate withdrawing human rights from the intellectually disabled, young children etc. Neither do I advocate treating Chimpanzees as having the same rights as adult humans.</p>
<p>But very basic Person (rather than Human) rights, yes. Life. Liberty. The pursuit of happiness. That will do as a start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Deoxy		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/evolution-and-the-legal-client/comment-page-1/#comment-14117</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deoxy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/index.php/2007/05/evolution-and-the-legal-client/#comment-14117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zoe - good luck with that.  You&#039;ve obviously not considered even a small portion of the questions and difficulties such a position would entail.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zoe &#8211; good luck with that.  You&#8217;ve obviously not considered even a small portion of the questions and difficulties such a position would entail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zoe Brain		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/evolution-and-the-legal-client/comment-page-1/#comment-14116</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zoe Brain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 11:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/index.php/2007/05/evolution-and-the-legal-client/#comment-14116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Any entity capable of expressing the conscious opinion that it is a person, and does not wish to be a slave, should be granted recognition as a free person.

I don&#039;t care what its DNA is, or even if it has DNA.

We can then move on to questions of legal competence.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any entity capable of expressing the conscious opinion that it is a person, and does not wish to be a slave, should be granted recognition as a free person.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care what its DNA is, or even if it has DNA.</p>
<p>We can then move on to questions of legal competence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nevins		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/evolution-and-the-legal-client/comment-page-1/#comment-14115</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nevins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 17:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/index.php/2007/05/evolution-and-the-legal-client/#comment-14115</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The jury of his peers concept should make voir dire interesting.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The jury of his peers concept should make voir dire interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
