<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Playground wood chips ruled unfair to disabled	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/playground-wood-chips-ruled-unfair-to-disabled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/playground-wood-chips-ruled-unfair-to-disabled/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 19:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave Lincoln		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/playground-wood-chips-ruled-unfair-to-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-7279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Lincoln]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4905#comment-7279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice one, Peter - I was just about to write something like that when I read your post!

Anyone know if they still even have see-saws anymore?  I guess I don&#039;t get out much to playgrounds, but just wondering if someone here could fill me in.  Was it a fat kid (scuse me, hefty kid) thing, where it&#039;s bad for their self-esteems?  Or is it bad for the small kids who take the chance of going flying when paired with the fat, damn! hefty kids?  Are lawyers going to take any and all fun out of this world?

(Don&#039;t answer the last one, too depressing)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one, Peter &#8211; I was just about to write something like that when I read your post!</p>
<p>Anyone know if they still even have see-saws anymore?  I guess I don&#8217;t get out much to playgrounds, but just wondering if someone here could fill me in.  Was it a fat kid (scuse me, hefty kid) thing, where it&#8217;s bad for their self-esteems?  Or is it bad for the small kids who take the chance of going flying when paired with the fat, damn! hefty kids?  Are lawyers going to take any and all fun out of this world?</p>
<p>(Don&#8217;t answer the last one, too depressing)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Collins		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/playground-wood-chips-ruled-unfair-to-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-7278</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 08:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4905#comment-7278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry ArtK.  Most playground equipment is covered with vinyl not rubber.  My nephew has the latex allergy and doesn&#039;t have a problem with playground equipment.......when we can find it.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry ArtK.  Most playground equipment is covered with vinyl not rubber.  My nephew has the latex allergy and doesn&#8217;t have a problem with playground equipment&#8230;&#8230;.when we can find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ArtK		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/playground-wood-chips-ruled-unfair-to-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-7277</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ArtK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 23:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4905#comment-7277</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Now we need someone whose child has a latex allergy to sue someone with the rubberized surface on their playground.  It&#039;s discrimination against someone with a disability!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now we need someone whose child has a latex allergy to sue someone with the rubberized surface on their playground.  It&#8217;s discrimination against someone with a disability!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jb		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/playground-wood-chips-ruled-unfair-to-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-7276</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 18:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4905#comment-7276</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[MHoc:  No, sue on the theory that if they&#039;d designed more interesting playgrounds your kids wouldn&#039;t have been forced to use the trees instead.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MHoc:  No, sue on the theory that if they&#8217;d designed more interesting playgrounds your kids wouldn&#8217;t have been forced to use the trees instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MHoc		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/playground-wood-chips-ruled-unfair-to-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-7275</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MHoc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 15:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4905#comment-7275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My kids aren&#039;t terribly excited about risk-free playgrounds. (If we are lucky we find the old fun playgrounds with rusty merry go rounds.) Nine times out of ten they choose to climb the trees next to the playground. If they ever slip and fall I&#039;ll be sure to sue on the basis that trees in a park are an attractive nuisance.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My kids aren&#8217;t terribly excited about risk-free playgrounds. (If we are lucky we find the old fun playgrounds with rusty merry go rounds.) Nine times out of ten they choose to climb the trees next to the playground. If they ever slip and fall I&#8217;ll be sure to sue on the basis that trees in a park are an attractive nuisance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/playground-wood-chips-ruled-unfair-to-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-7274</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 15:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4905#comment-7274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Meh.  When I was a kid, our playground equipment was on cement, and we liked it.  Only broke my arm once out there...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh.  When I was a kid, our playground equipment was on cement, and we liked it.  Only broke my arm once out there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OBQuiet		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/playground-wood-chips-ruled-unfair-to-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-7273</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OBQuiet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 14:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4905#comment-7273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yet another reason for schools to remove playgrounds and add to the obesity &#039;epidemic&#039;. Thus giving lawyers another thing to sue over.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another reason for schools to remove playgrounds and add to the obesity &#8216;epidemic&#8217;. Thus giving lawyers another thing to sue over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Collins		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/playground-wood-chips-ruled-unfair-to-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-7272</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4905#comment-7272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s see ADA specifies a 6% slope for all wheelchair ramps.  For a slide that is 6 ft tall you need a 100 ft ramp. So odds are that the sliding board is going to become an endangered species.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see ADA specifies a 6% slope for all wheelchair ramps.  For a slide that is 6 ft tall you need a 100 ft ramp. So odds are that the sliding board is going to become an endangered species.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg DWyer		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/05/playground-wood-chips-ruled-unfair-to-disabled/comment-page-1/#comment-7271</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg DWyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 12:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4905#comment-7271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How exactly is a kid in a wheelchair supposed to use a slide anyway? As far as I remember, they have difficulty with ladders as well as wood chips.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How exactly is a kid in a wheelchair supposed to use a slide anyway? As far as I remember, they have difficulty with ladders as well as wood chips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
