<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Update: Australian&#8217;s failed suicide try	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/06/update-australians-failed-suicide-try/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/06/update-australians-failed-suicide-try/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:49:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Deoxy		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/06/update-australians-failed-suicide-try/comment-page-1/#comment-7563</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deoxy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4974#comment-7563</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;(sometimes known as the &quot;everywhere-but-America rule&quot;)&quot;

HA!  That was good.  I may start using it...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;(sometimes known as the &#8220;everywhere-but-America rule&#8221;)&#8221;</p>
<p>HA!  That was good.  I may start using it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Suicidemalpractice.net		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/06/update-australians-failed-suicide-try/comment-page-1/#comment-7562</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suicidemalpractice.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 23:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=4974#comment-7562</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The US Fourth Circuit (VA, MD, WV) ruled that involuntary commitment is permitted, but not legally required, nor a duty.

Discussed here:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apa.org/psyclaw/currie.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.apa.org/psyclaw/currie.html&lt;/a&gt;

And in another case, in this decision:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=4th&amp;navby=case&amp;no=971218P&amp;exact=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=4th&amp;navby=case&amp;no=971218P&amp;exact=1&lt;/a&gt;

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Fourth Circuit (VA, MD, WV) ruled that involuntary commitment is permitted, but not legally required, nor a duty.</p>
<p>Discussed here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apa.org/psyclaw/currie.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.apa.org/psyclaw/currie.html</a></p>
<p>And in another case, in this decision:</p>
<p><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=4th&#038;navby=case&#038;no=971218P&#038;exact=1" rel="nofollow">http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=4th&#038;navby=case&#038;no=971218P&#038;exact=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
