<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Corporate Governance and Regulatory Reform	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/07/corporate-governance-and-regulatory-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/07/corporate-governance-and-regulatory-reform/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:34:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Cat		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/07/corporate-governance-and-regulatory-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-14532</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Cat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/index.php/2007/07/corporate-governance-and-regulatory-reform/#comment-14532</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While your point regarding destructive regulation may be  valid (destructive to whom?), I think you are missing the point.  The antitrust defendents frequently WANT the regulation to exist because it prevents others from doing exactly the same thing that they are trying to do.  They just don&#039;t want the regulation to apply to themselves.  Thus, they turn to the authors of the regulations, the power-brokers and the ex-insiders to try to get that outcome.

Status quo is good, as long as it doesn&#039;t apply to you.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While your point regarding destructive regulation may be  valid (destructive to whom?), I think you are missing the point.  The antitrust defendents frequently WANT the regulation to exist because it prevents others from doing exactly the same thing that they are trying to do.  They just don&#8217;t want the regulation to apply to themselves.  Thus, they turn to the authors of the regulations, the power-brokers and the ex-insiders to try to get that outcome.</p>
<p>Status quo is good, as long as it doesn&#8217;t apply to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
