<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Equal Protection v. Anticompetitive Prices	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/07/equal-protection-v-anticompetitive-prices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/07/equal-protection-v-anticompetitive-prices/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:36:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Glazius		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/07/equal-protection-v-anticompetitive-prices/comment-page-1/#comment-14538</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glazius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/index.php/2007/07/equal-protection-v-anticompetitive-prices/#comment-14538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My guess here is that no other form of trade besides cash has a note from the government on it guaranteeing its legality. You can&#039;t con anybody into believing that your $10 bill is worth $100, but you can con people into believing that your $10 sprinkler head is worth $100.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess here is that no other form of trade besides cash has a note from the government on it guaranteeing its legality. You can&#8217;t con anybody into believing that your $10 bill is worth $100, but you can con people into believing that your $10 sprinkler head is worth $100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
