Comments on: Next stop for boys’ team-cutting: high schools?

By: John Beaty

John Beaty — Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:21:19 +0000

I see the trolls are out again.

Please explain why schools should not have to spend equivalent dollars on women v men.

By: SheetWise

SheetWise — Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:36:23 +0000

The answer is simple — don’t discriminate. If women want to compete with men for positions on the co-ed basketball and football teams, let them.

By: Anonymous Attorney

Anonymous Attorney — Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:54:56 +0000

If I recall from my reading of the Federalist Papers, eliminating men’s college sports programs was a prime concern for James Madison. For Andrew Hamilton, meanwhile, the focus was more on the federal funding of women’s college sports programs. Either way, it’s heartening to see that we’ve stayed true to the founders’ vision.

By: Dave_

Dave_ — Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:28:51 +0000

I predict that within 30 years natural conceptions will be illegal because women can’t do it without male participation. I can see NOW lobbying to make all pregnancies originate from a sperm bank. Men will be forced to contribute to the bank at least twice a month and people will choose their sperm by genetic type, all donors will be anonymous. Natural pregnancies will be aborted.

It’s the only fair way to do it since a woman can’t get another woman pregnant. Something will have to be done to level the playing field. The fact that men can’t bear children or get each other pregnant is irrelevant.