Comments on: Nifong’s media and law-school enablers, cont’d https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/08/nifongs-media-and-law-school-enablers-contd/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:30:24 +0000 hourly 1 By: Before and After https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/08/nifongs-media-and-law-school-enablers-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-37191 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:30:24 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5189#comment-37191 […] prosecutorial abuse is a problem that’s gotten more attention in the past year thanks to a certain District Attorney, but it hasn’t gotten enough to suit […]

]]> By: Steve White https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/08/nifongs-media-and-law-school-enablers-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-8501 Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:56:39 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5189#comment-8501 I had no idea that pundits were ‘assigned’ to one side of a debate or the other. Does that mean that if Ms. Murphy had been assigned to the other side on the Duke case debate, she would dutifully slammed Mr. Nifong?

At least, now I know where MS-NBC, CNN and Fox get all those nutty opinions — they’re just ‘assigned’. Whew!

]]> By: mojo https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/08/nifongs-media-and-law-school-enablers-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-8500 Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:28:31 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5189#comment-8500 “Look, I think the real key here is that these guys, like so many rapists–and I’m going to say it because, at this point, she’s entitled to the respect that she is a crime victim.”

Sounds like slander to me. Or would it be libel?

]]>