<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Wildly off-topic: Michael Moore&#8217;s &#8220;Sicko&#8221; box office	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/08/wildly-off-topic-michael-moores-sicko-box-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/08/wildly-off-topic-michael-moores-sicko-box-office/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:19:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dick King		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/08/wildly-off-topic-michael-moores-sicko-box-office/comment-page-1/#comment-8539</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5204#comment-8539</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re the first comment, only three of the classifications are at all questionable.

It&#039;s mildly interesting that three iconic leftie documentries [Inconvenient Truth, Sicko and Bowling for Columbine] all came in closely spaced at approximately $21-22M.

Could there be a fixed number of True Believers, $21M worth, but a movie like this has to break out into the general population [as Farenheit 9/11 did] to do better than that?

-dk

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the first comment, only three of the classifications are at all questionable.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s mildly interesting that three iconic leftie documentries [Inconvenient Truth, Sicko and Bowling for Columbine] all came in closely spaced at approximately $21-22M.</p>
<p>Could there be a fixed number of True Believers, $21M worth, but a movie like this has to break out into the general population [as Farenheit 9/11 did] to do better than that?</p>
<p>-dk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/08/wildly-off-topic-michael-moores-sicko-box-office/comment-page-1/#comment-8538</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5204#comment-8538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[BoxOfficeMojo calls Eddie Murphy Raw and the Jackass movies documentaries, but just excludes them from their count.  A Village Voice critic called Jackass the best documentary of the year, and it technically fits the definition of a documentary; it&#039;s just not a highbrow documentary.  Andrew Sullivan covered the same point in 2004.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BoxOfficeMojo calls Eddie Murphy Raw and the Jackass movies documentaries, but just excludes them from their count.  A Village Voice critic called Jackass the best documentary of the year, and it technically fits the definition of a documentary; it&#8217;s just not a highbrow documentary.  Andrew Sullivan covered the same point in 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt b		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/08/wildly-off-topic-michael-moores-sicko-box-office/comment-page-1/#comment-8537</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt b]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5204#comment-8537</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not sure where you got that some of those are documentaries.  I don&#039;t consider Jackass and Eddie Murphy stand comedy as &quot;documentaries&quot;.  True the 4th number is just cherry picking from wherever (boxofficemojo has it at 4), but it is certainly higher than 22nd, no that it really matters.  I haven&#039;t seen  Sicko and don&#039;t want to- more junk from Michael Moore.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure where you got that some of those are documentaries.  I don&#8217;t consider Jackass and Eddie Murphy stand comedy as &#8220;documentaries&#8221;.  True the 4th number is just cherry picking from wherever (boxofficemojo has it at 4), but it is certainly higher than 22nd, no that it really matters.  I haven&#8217;t seen  Sicko and don&#8217;t want to- more junk from Michael Moore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
