Comments on: Imus lawsuit: nevermind https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/09/imus-lawsuit-nevermind/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Fri, 30 May 2008 01:06:50 +0000 hourly 1 By: Beldar https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/09/imus-lawsuit-nevermind/comment-page-1/#comment-14693 Tue, 18 Sep 2007 03:46:59 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/index.php/2007/09/imus-lawsuit-nevermind/#comment-14693 That’s one possible, albeit speculative, translation.

Another one would be: Having realized that a defamation plaintiff opens his or her entire reputation and therefore entire personal history to probing, the plaintiff decided that the risks of embarrassment and harassment outweighed the likely gains from the litigation.

]]> By: Todd Rogers https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/09/imus-lawsuit-nevermind/comment-page-1/#comment-14692 Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:17:01 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/index.php/2007/09/imus-lawsuit-nevermind/#comment-14692 So Imus (and CBS) dodged the bullet. And likely, they did it before the fees incurred from motion after motion. Lucky them.

]]> By: AMcAMcA https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/09/imus-lawsuit-nevermind/comment-page-1/#comment-14691 Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:36:08 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/index.php/2007/09/imus-lawsuit-nevermind/#comment-14691 No, actually I think we’ve made a strong statement that Mr. Ancowicz is a lawyer who’ll file anything so as to get his face on camera.

]]> By: Anonymous Attorney https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/09/imus-lawsuit-nevermind/comment-page-1/#comment-14690 Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:29:39 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/index.php/2007/09/imus-lawsuit-nevermind/#comment-14690 And by the way, weren’t those RUTGERS fans screaming obscenities at Navy?

http://blog.nj.com/njv_mark_diionno/2007/09/rutgers_part_two_no_excuses_fo.html

Who will make a strong statement about that hateful speech?

]]>