Comments on: Wisconsin Supreme Court follies: Heikkinen v. Archdiocese https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/10/wisconsin-supreme-court-follies-heikkinen-v-archdiocese/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Sat, 17 May 2008 06:02:04 +0000 hourly 1 By: illusory tenant https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/10/wisconsin-supreme-court-follies-heikkinen-v-archdiocese/comment-page-1/#comment-9259 Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:30:31 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5454#comment-9259 “the church, which ended up being held responsible on the principle of respondeat superior …”

False. Please read the Court of Appeals decision.

]]> By: jkoerner https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/10/wisconsin-supreme-court-follies-heikkinen-v-archdiocese/comment-page-1/#comment-9258 Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:59:09 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5454#comment-9258 Her post says that the conservative block voted for the plaintiffs – is she wrong or the “liberal activist” court labal not an issue in this case?

[That’s not what her post says. — TF.]

]]>