<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Daniel Solove&#8217;s The Future of Reputation	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/12/daniel-soloves-the-future-of-reputation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/12/daniel-soloves-the-future-of-reputation/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:39:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet by Law Professor Daniel Solove		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/12/daniel-soloves-the-future-of-reputation/comment-page-1/#comment-25226</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet by Law Professor Daniel Solove]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5615#comment-25226</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Ted Frank writes: &#034;Daniel Solove&#8217;s solution to the potential problem of damning information on the Internet is to open up the libel laws and to remove the Communications Decency Act safe-harbor for site owners. As Amber Taylor points out in a provocative review, one could take this chain more seriously if Solove more directly considered the real-world consequences of such a rule, and the amount of true speech it would shut down because of the potential legal expense of defending speech in the absence of bright-line rules.&#034; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Ted Frank writes: &quot;Daniel Solove&rsquo;s solution to the potential problem of damning information on the Internet is to open up the libel laws and to remove the Communications Decency Act safe-harbor for site owners. As Amber Taylor points out in a provocative review, one could take this chain more seriously if Solove more directly considered the real-world consequences of such a rule, and the amount of true speech it would shut down because of the potential legal expense of defending speech in the absence of bright-line rules.&quot; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
