<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 4,896 opt-outs in Sears tippy-stove class action	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/01/4896-opt-outs-in-sears-tippy-stove-class-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/01/4896-opt-outs-in-sears-tippy-stove-class-action/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:08:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tippy-stove class action, cont&#8217;d		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/01/4896-opt-outs-in-sears-tippy-stove-class-action/comment-page-1/#comment-27863</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tippy-stove class action, cont&#8217;d]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5803#comment-27863</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Does class actioneer Stephen Tillery really want to call renewed public attention to his settlement with Sears, in which the settling lawyers made out so well ($17 million) given the somewhat elusive benefits to the class of consumers? (Madison County Record, Jul. 30, and editorial, Aug. 2). Our earlier coverage of the case appeared Jan. 31. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Does class actioneer Stephen Tillery really want to call renewed public attention to his settlement with Sears, in which the settling lawyers made out so well ($17 million) given the somewhat elusive benefits to the class of consumers? (Madison County Record, Jul. 30, and editorial, Aug. 2). Our earlier coverage of the case appeared Jan. 31. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kimsch		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/01/4896-opt-outs-in-sears-tippy-stove-class-action/comment-page-1/#comment-10530</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kimsch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5803#comment-10530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I had a Sears stove installed during the period indicated.  My previous stove had an anti-tip device that worked with the new stove, so it wasn&#039;t necessary to install the anti-tip device when the new one was installed. How many people had a new stove installed that already had the anti-tip device in place so that the installer wouldn&#039;t necessarily have to install an anti-tip when installing the stove?

BTW I love my new Kenmore stainless steel 5 burner /convection oven stove. It&#039;s the bomb.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a Sears stove installed during the period indicated.  My previous stove had an anti-tip device that worked with the new stove, so it wasn&#8217;t necessary to install the anti-tip device when the new one was installed. How many people had a new stove installed that already had the anti-tip device in place so that the installer wouldn&#8217;t necessarily have to install an anti-tip when installing the stove?</p>
<p>BTW I love my new Kenmore stainless steel 5 burner /convection oven stove. It&#8217;s the bomb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pete Madsen		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/01/4896-opt-outs-in-sears-tippy-stove-class-action/comment-page-1/#comment-10529</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete Madsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5803#comment-10529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is kinda peripheral, I guess; my wife, a real estate broker, had a buyer who when she moved in found that the sellers had broken the oven door by standing on it to remove items from the cupboard above the stove. Must not have been a Sears stove, as it didn&#039;t tip.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is kinda peripheral, I guess; my wife, a real estate broker, had a buyer who when she moved in found that the sellers had broken the oven door by standing on it to remove items from the cupboard above the stove. Must not have been a Sears stove, as it didn&#8217;t tip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert E. Edick		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/01/4896-opt-outs-in-sears-tippy-stove-class-action/comment-page-1/#comment-10528</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert E. Edick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5803#comment-10528</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wonder if courts have ever explored the possibility of pegging the attorney fees in some ratio to the amount actually redeemed by the class?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if courts have ever explored the possibility of pegging the attorney fees in some ratio to the amount actually redeemed by the class?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
