Comments on: February 14 roundup

By: “The Naked Cowboy versus The Blue M&M”

“The Naked Cowboy versus The Blue M&M” — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:18:41 +0000

[…] The court, however, refused to render summary judgment on the Naked Cowboy’s Lanham Act claim of false endorsement, on the grounds that passers-by might confuse the M&M video for the Cowboy’s (somewhat dubious?) endorsement. (Earlier coverage). […]

By: OBQuiet

OBQuiet — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:12:38 +0000

Boston Gun article:

I went to the link and saw the picture. New caption:

Officer stands by ready to lob tear gas while SWAT team member in Riot helmet attempts to wrestle weapon from accused assailant.

By: KDP

KDP — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:19:59 +0000

Did you see the “jurist with the great eyeglasses”? She looks like a character out of a “Far Side” cartoon! I thought she had banned the television program because one of the characters in the program parodied her and those “great eyeglasses”.

By: Patrick McEvoy

Patrick McEvoy — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:59:32 +0000

The most important thing in the news today is the “naked Cowboy” going after M&M’s for trying to profit by his own self invented “gimmick.”

Hurray for the naked Cowboy…shame shame on M&Ms.

Patrick McEvoy
President
Rainmaker Best Practices
http://www.rainmakerbestpractices.com/

By: Ted

Ted — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:13:47 +0000

Beldar’s criticism of McCain takes one sentence out of context, and is then ludicrously literal about it to the point of disingenuousness in claiming that it eliminates all but federal judges from the bench. An active Federalist Society member or DOJ official who has spoken out in favor of judicial restraint would readily qualify under McCain’s stated criterion. John Roberts would be qualified well before he was named to the DC Circuit; Harriet Miers wouldn’t.

McCain’s made a promise here, and he’s an honorable man. He’s got the best legal minds advising him. This isn’t an issue where I’m worried.