<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Whistle While You Work	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/02/whistle-while-you-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/02/whistle-while-you-work/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:19:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/02/whistle-while-you-work/comment-page-1/#comment-14831</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/index.php/2008/02/whistle-while-you-work/#comment-14831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Peter, this post, parroting a plaintiffs&#039; lawyers&#039; blog, makes no sense.  S. 2045 is fatally flawed because it has wildly overprotective &quot;whistleblower&quot; protection, as Overlawyered discussed &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/02/congresss_latest_gift_to_lawye.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Feb. 20&lt;/a&gt;.  Why on earth do you think the bill should be made even worse?  As &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/08/sox_whistleblower_claims.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Overlawyered discussed in August&lt;/a&gt;, previous whistleblower bills generated far more litigation than whistleblowing.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, this post, parroting a plaintiffs&#8217; lawyers&#8217; blog, makes no sense.  S. 2045 is fatally flawed because it has wildly overprotective &#8220;whistleblower&#8221; protection, as Overlawyered discussed <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/02/congresss_latest_gift_to_lawye.html" rel="nofollow">Feb. 20</a>.  Why on earth do you think the bill should be made even worse?  As <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2007/08/sox_whistleblower_claims.html" rel="nofollow">Overlawyered discussed in August</a>, previous whistleblower bills generated far more litigation than whistleblowing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
