<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Client-chasing dot-orgs	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/03/client-chasing-dot-orgs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/03/client-chasing-dot-orgs/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:18:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Schwartz		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/03/client-chasing-dot-orgs/comment-page-1/#comment-11382</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Schwartz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6025#comment-11382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While .org was once reserved for non-profit organizations, it is not a gTLD (generic top level domain) just like .com and .net. Anyone can get a .org domain for any reason.

Basically, non-profits need to get a .com domain anyway to protect their name and prevent people looking for them from finding other companies. So it didn&#039;t seem fair to prohibit the same protection for for-profit organizations.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While .org was once reserved for non-profit organizations, it is not a gTLD (generic top level domain) just like .com and .net. Anyone can get a .org domain for any reason.</p>
<p>Basically, non-profits need to get a .com domain anyway to protect their name and prevent people looking for them from finding other companies. So it didn&#8217;t seem fair to prohibit the same protection for for-profit organizations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AZFlyer		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/03/client-chasing-dot-orgs/comment-page-1/#comment-11381</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AZFlyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6025#comment-11381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;And what&#039;s with the law firms&#039; having managed to secure dot-org domains for these ventures, just as if they were nonprofit or something?&quot;

Pretty much anyone can get a .org domain.  It is recommended that .org be used for non-profit organizations, but no one actually enforces it.  Replace the .com with .org on most large corporate sites and you&#039;ll get the same company (i.e. www.microsoft.org).
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And what&#8217;s with the law firms&#8217; having managed to secure dot-org domains for these ventures, just as if they were nonprofit or something?&#8221;</p>
<p>Pretty much anyone can get a .org domain.  It is recommended that .org be used for non-profit organizations, but no one actually enforces it.  Replace the .com with .org on most large corporate sites and you&#8217;ll get the same company (i.e. <a href="http://www.microsoft.org/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.microsoft.org/</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
