<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Eliot Smurfer	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/03/eliot-smurfer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/03/eliot-smurfer/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Robin		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/03/eliot-smurfer/comment-page-1/#comment-11187</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=5969#comment-11187</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[These money laundering requirements are another example of the Feds forcing private parties to perform their searches for them, thereby circumventing constitutional restrictions.  These particular laws seem extreme in how far they have taken this, but there are other solid examples such as BATFE records requirements which form a defacto firearms registry.

The country needs some smart lawyers to figure out a way to get such government activity overturned on 4th ammendment or other constitutional grounds.

It cannot be (although I guess it is) that the government can force private citizens to do what it is forbidden to do itself, nor authorize people (via agencies of the government) to do what it is forbidden to do by the constitution.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These money laundering requirements are another example of the Feds forcing private parties to perform their searches for them, thereby circumventing constitutional restrictions.  These particular laws seem extreme in how far they have taken this, but there are other solid examples such as BATFE records requirements which form a defacto firearms registry.</p>
<p>The country needs some smart lawyers to figure out a way to get such government activity overturned on 4th ammendment or other constitutional grounds.</p>
<p>It cannot be (although I guess it is) that the government can force private citizens to do what it is forbidden to do itself, nor authorize people (via agencies of the government) to do what it is forbidden to do by the constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
