Comments on: Massachusetts mulls “sexual fraud”

By: markm

markm — Sun, 16 Mar 2008 08:33:40 +0000

Could a clever prosecutor stretch that to cover campaign promises made with the intention of “screwing” the public?

By: ruralcounsel

ruralcounsel — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:02:01 +0000

Or “…to love, honor, and obey…” or “…to cleave unto no other…” or “[insert your favorite marriage vow here]”

But I agree with Hustiac … more damage is done by lying politicians than by “sexual fraud”.

By: Melvin

Melvin — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:30:15 +0000

How about the man who takes a beautiful woman to bed . . . only to find out that “she” was a “he” instead!

By: Insomniac

Insomniac — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:03:44 +0000

Or, “Of course I’ll still respect you in the morning!”

By: roy

roy — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:42:43 +0000

Does “I love you” count?

By: Jim Copland

Jim Copland — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:21:26 +0000

So would this law turn a simple class B solicitation misdemeanor into a felony if you, say, went under the name “George Fox”?

By: Supremacy Claus

Supremacy Claus — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:06:51 +0000

I support this legislation. If it prevents the shock, bewilderment, and dismay of a single additional, future victim of sexual fraud, after the doffing of a figure enhancing bra, this law may avert that tragedy.

By: Hustiac

Hustiac — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:58:44 +0000

I could go along with this legislation if the same law also covered puffery and hyperbole uttered by candidates for political office.