<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: N.H. jury: lawyer&#8217;s demand letters amounted to extortion	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/03/nh-jury-lawyers-demand-letters-amounted-to-extortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/03/nh-jury-lawyers-demand-letters-amounted-to-extortion/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 04:30:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: markm		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/03/nh-jury-lawyers-demand-letters-amounted-to-extortion/comment-page-1/#comment-11368</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6020#comment-11368</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What would fix this: Loser pays, starting with the expenses of responding to a demand letter.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would fix this: Loser pays, starting with the expenses of responding to a demand letter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ken		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/03/nh-jury-lawyers-demand-letters-amounted-to-extortion/comment-page-1/#comment-11367</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6020#comment-11367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In 2006 the California Supreme Court addresses the settlement-demand-as-extortion question in Flately v. Mauro, which involved some unpleasantness directed at the Lord of the Dance.  It&#039;s got a great discussion of the line between a legitimate demand and extortion.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2006 the California Supreme Court addresses the settlement-demand-as-extortion question in Flately v. Mauro, which involved some unpleasantness directed at the Lord of the Dance.  It&#8217;s got a great discussion of the line between a legitimate demand and extortion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
