<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Great moments in forfeiture law	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/04/great-moments-in-forfeiture-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/04/great-moments-in-forfeiture-law/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: William Nuesslein		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/04/great-moments-in-forfeiture-law/comment-page-1/#comment-11535</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Nuesslein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6079#comment-11535</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The trouble with the theory that frugal living gave rise to $400,000 in the home safe is that such savings pay no dividends or interest. One could test the story by looking at series dates on the bills. How much of the money is 1970 vintage?

Still, I don&#039;t like the punishment of forfeiture for a non-defined crime. The &quot;REASON&quot; article suggests that the government has an obligation, under law, to show the $400,000 to be ill gotten gains.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trouble with the theory that frugal living gave rise to $400,000 in the home safe is that such savings pay no dividends or interest. One could test the story by looking at series dates on the bills. How much of the money is 1970 vintage?</p>
<p>Still, I don&#8217;t like the punishment of forfeiture for a non-defined crime. The &#8220;REASON&#8221; article suggests that the government has an obligation, under law, to show the $400,000 to be ill gotten gains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
