<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Kathleen Seidel blogger-subpoena furor	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/04/kathleen-seidel-blogger-subpoena-furor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/04/kathleen-seidel-blogger-subpoena-furor/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:12:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: laurentius-rex		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/04/kathleen-seidel-blogger-subpoena-furor/comment-page-1/#comment-11547</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[laurentius-rex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6083#comment-11547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a party who whose cyber entity is named (twice as it happens) in this rickety subpoena I would be happy to testify at whatever hearing Mr Shoemaker would like me to, but he would have to be fair and above board about it and meet my terms equitably (do you know what equity means Mr Shoemaker?

To begin with I am not even sure I could travel to the USA legally, It might require a special visa for me as I am not free to travel to the US without one, and even then my travel arrangements would need to accommodate my disabilities, (I do not fly and you would not want to share the confined space of an Aeroplane with me, be assured of that). I think a video link would be more pragmatic, indeed if Mr Shoemaker or any interested third party wants to set it up and can pay all my out of pocket expences, then why not.

I don&#039;t think he would like my testimony however and he would have to be prepared to answer my questions under oath himself. I would very much like to oblige him but the terms would involve his paying top dollar for a UK barrister (Michael Mansfield perhaps) to assist me in presenting the evidence he requires.

My religion Mr Shoemaker, Born again Baptist!

Then again if Mr Shoemaker is correct in what he is litigating for I am nothing but a mercury damaged head case with nothing sane nor sensible to say, he should be getting me my compensation :)

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a party who whose cyber entity is named (twice as it happens) in this rickety subpoena I would be happy to testify at whatever hearing Mr Shoemaker would like me to, but he would have to be fair and above board about it and meet my terms equitably (do you know what equity means Mr Shoemaker?</p>
<p>To begin with I am not even sure I could travel to the USA legally, It might require a special visa for me as I am not free to travel to the US without one, and even then my travel arrangements would need to accommodate my disabilities, (I do not fly and you would not want to share the confined space of an Aeroplane with me, be assured of that). I think a video link would be more pragmatic, indeed if Mr Shoemaker or any interested third party wants to set it up and can pay all my out of pocket expences, then why not.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think he would like my testimony however and he would have to be prepared to answer my questions under oath himself. I would very much like to oblige him but the terms would involve his paying top dollar for a UK barrister (Michael Mansfield perhaps) to assist me in presenting the evidence he requires.</p>
<p>My religion Mr Shoemaker, Born again Baptist!</p>
<p>Then again if Mr Shoemaker is correct in what he is litigating for I am nothing but a mercury damaged head case with nothing sane nor sensible to say, he should be getting me my compensation 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Liz Ditz		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/04/kathleen-seidel-blogger-subpoena-furor/comment-page-1/#comment-11546</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liz Ditz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6083#comment-11546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know why the Seidel story hasn&#039;t been picked up by the mainstream press.  I&#039;ve emailed the story to a couple of my reporter contacts.

However I have four speculations about the cause of the lack of interest:

1. &quot;Oh, it&#039;s a &lt;i&gt;blogging&lt;/i&gt; thing.  Who cares what happens to some blogger?  They&#039;re not &lt;i&gt;real&lt;/i&gt; journalists&quot;
2.&quot;Oh, it&#039;s an &lt;i&gt;autism&lt;/i&gt; thing.  Shrug.&quot;
3. &quot;Oh, it&#039;s a &lt;i&gt;vaccine&lt;/i&gt; thing.  Shrug.&quot;
4. &quot;What&#039;s the big deal with a subpoena?  What does she have to hide?&quot; -- the last from people who fail to grasp the point that Seidel has nothing whatever to do with the matters addressed in the litigation.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why the Seidel story hasn&#8217;t been picked up by the mainstream press.  I&#8217;ve emailed the story to a couple of my reporter contacts.</p>
<p>However I have four speculations about the cause of the lack of interest:</p>
<p>1. &#8220;Oh, it&#8217;s a <i>blogging</i> thing.  Who cares what happens to some blogger?  They&#8217;re not <i>real</i> journalists&#8221;<br />
2.&#8221;Oh, it&#8217;s an <i>autism</i> thing.  Shrug.&#8221;<br />
3. &#8220;Oh, it&#8217;s a <i>vaccine</i> thing.  Shrug.&#8221;<br />
4. &#8220;What&#8217;s the big deal with a subpoena?  What does she have to hide?&#8221; &#8212; the last from people who fail to grasp the point that Seidel has nothing whatever to do with the matters addressed in the litigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SPO		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/04/kathleen-seidel-blogger-subpoena-furor/comment-page-1/#comment-11545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SPO]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6083#comment-11545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This lawyer needs some jail time.  The coercive powers of the courts are not to be hijacked so attorneys can intimidate others from speaking out.  If I were the judge, I would simply throw this guy in jail for contempt of court.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This lawyer needs some jail time.  The coercive powers of the courts are not to be hijacked so attorneys can intimidate others from speaking out.  If I were the judge, I would simply throw this guy in jail for contempt of court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ken		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/04/kathleen-seidel-blogger-subpoena-furor/comment-page-1/#comment-11544</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6083#comment-11544</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I doubt it will get much mainstream press, unfortunately, because (1) it&#039;s complicated (compared to how news stories are presented, anyway) and (2) the good guys in the story are bloggers.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it will get much mainstream press, unfortunately, because (1) it&#8217;s complicated (compared to how news stories are presented, anyway) and (2) the good guys in the story are bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
