<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Breaking and exclusive: FACTA held unconstitutional	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/breaking-and-exclusive-facta-held-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/breaking-and-exclusive-facta-held-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:02:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Grimes v. Raves Motion Pictures FACTA decision reversed		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/breaking-and-exclusive-facta-held-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-44721</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grimes v. Raves Motion Pictures FACTA decision reversed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7063#comment-44721</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] year, Overlawyered was the first to report that Judge William Acker in the Northern District of Alabama had held the Fair and Accurate Credit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] year, Overlawyered was the first to report that Judge William Acker in the Northern District of Alabama had held the Fair and Accurate Credit [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The exception to &#8220;all publicity is good publicity&#8221;		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/breaking-and-exclusive-facta-held-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-18757</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The exception to &#8220;all publicity is good publicity&#8221;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 12:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7063#comment-18757</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who spoke to the Birmingham News about the recent Judge Acker decision and FACTA amendments sounds like an interesting fellow who has thought about some of the same issues I have, even if he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who spoke to the Birmingham News about the recent Judge Acker decision and FACTA amendments sounds like an interesting fellow who has thought about some of the same issues I have, even if he [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Venkat		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/breaking-and-exclusive-facta-held-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-18626</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Venkat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 21:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7063#comment-18626</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You gotta love the language in the order.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You gotta love the language in the order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
