Comments on: Client-chasing roundup

By: Asbestos: Part Deux

Asbestos: Part Deux — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:48:15 +0000

[…] marketing tactics are also of the sophisticated variety. As Overlawyered readers are aware, the most expensive Google ad-search terms involve “asbestos” and […]

By: Alan Kellogg

Alan Kellogg — Fri, 30 May 2008 16:01:39 +0000

Let’s see; a company, a legal entity, takes action against a party that is allegedly defaming the company. And yet the company, a plaintiff, is denied certain rights under the law because it is a company. Have I got that right.

How much you wanna bet the state of California will be enacting another law so companies will enjoy the same protection under the original SLAPP legislation as ‘real plaintiffs’ do? And so we will see yet again what happens when we allow fuss budget nit picking to add to our supply of effectively redundant laws.

I’ve got news for people; it doesn’t matter how the victim died, what matters is why the victim died.

By: AMcA

AMcA — Fri, 30 May 2008 14:33:17 +0000

Well, I say we should all go and click on all the Mesothelioma Attorney sponsored sites at least once a day. Transfer a little income from non-productive sector attorneys to highly innovative, highly productive Google.

Just think, with a few clicks every day, you too can do your little bit to promote the productive economy every day!