<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Inside the Eskimo global-warming suit	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/inside-the-eskimo-global-warming-suit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/inside-the-eskimo-global-warming-suit/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 15:59:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Christopher Eckel		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/inside-the-eskimo-global-warming-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-16135</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Eckel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 19:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7011#comment-16135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#039;t the oil companies be able to sue other guilty parties to assist them in paying their liability in the event of a successful suit? I can&#039;t imagine any class of people deeper pockets or with a larger &quot;carbon footprint&quot; than trial lawyers, with their private jets and 25,000 square foot houses.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t the oil companies be able to sue other guilty parties to assist them in paying their liability in the event of a successful suit? I can&#8217;t imagine any class of people deeper pockets or with a larger &#8220;carbon footprint&#8221; than trial lawyers, with their private jets and 25,000 square foot houses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Nieporent		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/inside-the-eskimo-global-warming-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-16036</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Nieporent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7011#comment-16036</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I inadvertently let off the footnote.

** Which of course means that this lawsuit is a winner.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I inadvertently let off the footnote.</p>
<p>** Which of course means that this lawsuit is a winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Nieporent		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/inside-the-eskimo-global-warming-suit/comment-page-1/#comment-16034</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Nieporent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7011#comment-16034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If any lawsuit called for Rule 11 sanctions this would be it. This is one of the most preposterous lawsuits that I have ever heard about**. At least when it comes to tobacco one can argue that given the health risks there is no societal benefit in smoking. Of course the tobacco lawsuits were not intended to outlaw smoking, just to enrich lawyers (and government) . With respect to energy, we are dealing with an industry that is vital to our economy.  Without energy civilization would collapse.   

&lt;I&gt;the suit also accuses eight of the firms (American Electric Power, BP America, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Duke Energy, ExxonMobil, Peabody Energy, and Southern Company) of conspiring to cover up the threat of man-made climate change.  … This second charge arguably eliminates the need for a judge to determine how much greenhouse-gas production—from refining fossil fuel and burning it to produce energy—is acceptable. “You’re not asking the court to evaluate the reasonableness of the conduct,” Berman says. “You’re asking a court to evaluate if somebody conspired to lie.” Monetary damages to Kivalina need not be sourced exclusively to the defendants’ emissions; they would derive from bad-faith efforts to prevent the enactment of public measures that might have slowed the warming.&lt;/I&gt;

Well what a surprise. The purpose of the lawsuit is not an attempt to address the problem of global warming but to make large amounts of money for the lawyers.  Who would of thought that? If we think $4.00 a gallon gas is expensive now, just wait until the price jumps to $20 a gallon to pay all of the judgments against the oil companies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If any lawsuit called for Rule 11 sanctions this would be it. This is one of the most preposterous lawsuits that I have ever heard about**. At least when it comes to tobacco one can argue that given the health risks there is no societal benefit in smoking. Of course the tobacco lawsuits were not intended to outlaw smoking, just to enrich lawyers (and government) . With respect to energy, we are dealing with an industry that is vital to our economy.  Without energy civilization would collapse.   </p>
<p><i>the suit also accuses eight of the firms (American Electric Power, BP America, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Duke Energy, ExxonMobil, Peabody Energy, and Southern Company) of conspiring to cover up the threat of man-made climate change.  … This second charge arguably eliminates the need for a judge to determine how much greenhouse-gas production—from refining fossil fuel and burning it to produce energy—is acceptable. “You’re not asking the court to evaluate the reasonableness of the conduct,” Berman says. “You’re asking a court to evaluate if somebody conspired to lie.” Monetary damages to Kivalina need not be sourced exclusively to the defendants’ emissions; they would derive from bad-faith efforts to prevent the enactment of public measures that might have slowed the warming.</i></p>
<p>Well what a surprise. The purpose of the lawsuit is not an attempt to address the problem of global warming but to make large amounts of money for the lawyers.  Who would of thought that? If we think $4.00 a gallon gas is expensive now, just wait until the price jumps to $20 a gallon to pay all of the judgments against the oil companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
