<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The asbestos litigation machine	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/the-asbestos-litigation-machine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/the-asbestos-litigation-machine/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: E-Bell		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/the-asbestos-litigation-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-11805</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E-Bell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 08:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6193#comment-11805</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is a good report.  Everyone who thinks there&#039;s nothing wrong with mass tort litigation should read it.

I&#039;ve had a brief exposure to asbestos litigation on the defense side.  What I saw was pretty amazing.

These mass tort lawyers go to the union halls and sign people up who &lt;i&gt;might&lt;/i&gt; have been exposed to asbestos at some point in their past.  They get screened by a hand-picked doctor, who invariably finds that the 85-year-old man who smoked 2 packs a day for 60 years and has recently started to develop shortness of breath has an indeterminate smudge on his chest x-ray.

The diagnosis, of course, is asbestosis.

Almost invariably, these plaintiffs can&#039;t provide any evidence that they were exposed to asbestos-containing products at all, let alone which products they were or which companies made them.

It&#039;s a shakedown, pure and simple.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good report.  Everyone who thinks there&#8217;s nothing wrong with mass tort litigation should read it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had a brief exposure to asbestos litigation on the defense side.  What I saw was pretty amazing.</p>
<p>These mass tort lawyers go to the union halls and sign people up who <i>might</i> have been exposed to asbestos at some point in their past.  They get screened by a hand-picked doctor, who invariably finds that the 85-year-old man who smoked 2 packs a day for 60 years and has recently started to develop shortness of breath has an indeterminate smudge on his chest x-ray.</p>
<p>The diagnosis, of course, is asbestosis.</p>
<p>Almost invariably, these plaintiffs can&#8217;t provide any evidence that they were exposed to asbestos-containing products at all, let alone which products they were or which companies made them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shakedown, pure and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous Attorney		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/05/the-asbestos-litigation-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-11804</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Attorney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=6193#comment-11804</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Looks like a solid report. We need John Stossel of ABC to feature it.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a solid report. We need John Stossel of ABC to feature it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
