Comments on: Judge Kozinski’s web site and Cyrus Sanai

By: Tynan on Technology (beta) » Blog Archive » Jurists gone wild

Tynan on Technology (beta) » Blog Archive » Jurists gone wild — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:12:09 +0000

[…] there’s the source of this story: Cyrus Sanai, a Los Angeles attorney who has been publicly feuding with Kozinski for years. He found Kozinski’s cache six month ago and has been peddling this story ever […]

By: Ted Frank

Ted Frank — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 03:57:47 +0000

I hereby link to the eminently reasonable decision in Fine v. Chevron (9th Cir. 1995), which is consistent with the federal government's reading of the False Claim Act in its amicus brief in that case. Not clear to me why Mitch is still incoherently bitter about this case 13 years later.

By: Mitch

Mitch — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:20:22 +0000

Cyrus Sania has some valid points on the 9th Circuit, and Kozinski’s pathetic attempts to gloss over his problems, it only underscores them even more
In the case of U S ex rel Fine v Chevron, Kozinski with S Trott, formed some cult of hate, concocting names for Harold Fine, other than who he was, in an exercise so devoid of judicial ethics, it warrants full Congressional Investigations. Google it, Fine Cheveron Trott. Read the opinions of Trott and Kozinski.
When the 3rd Circuit reveiws Kozinski, and writes, if it used the Trott/ Kozinski standard, it would refer to him as The Larry Lynt of L A DARK Chambers, use 4 or 5 other names, not his real name, some with a tinge of demonic anger, and note hate again, then tell all “imagine”, then concoct some lies, some fabrications, then go back to the French Revolution, to fling into the rulings, and note the first to be hanged, or gullotined. You laugh.. / Read the subject opnion noted, it is not a laughing matter that is EXHIBIT NO 1–the Kozinski problem. It illustrates serious problems in the 9th Circuit, and Kozinski is at the heart of them

By: Cyrus Sanai: Kozinski investigation “is part of a litigation strategy”; second Sanai v. Saltz sanctions order

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:04:36 +0000

[…] Sanai tells Patterico that his triggering an investigation of Judge Alex Kozinski’s web site is all “part of a litigation strategy” but does not reveal what the other two steps of […]

By: Latest on Kozinski and Cyrus Sanai

Latest on Kozinski and Cyrus Sanai — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:24:37 +0000

[…] Earlier: June 15 and June 12. […]

By: kwh

kwh — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:21:01 +0000

jbd says:

“But he defended his position [pro-death penalty] by launching into extremely graphic and grotesque descriptions of torture and murder of children by pederasts. It was weird and kind of spooky.”

What’s really weird and spooky is for someone to view the citation of a perverse and grisly murder as a non sequitur when arguing for the death penalty.

But jbd doesn’t stop there: She takes a step into the realm of mind reading and evidence invention: She pretends to be able to look into Kozinksy’s mind and finds nothing but prurience: You see, Kozinsky wasn’t saying “here’s a case where the extremity of the crime cries out for the death penalty”. Oh, no, no, no: Kozinsky gets excited from such stories!

By: fishbane

fishbane — Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:00:59 +0000

Cyrus, shut up already. You’re part of the story not part of the commentariat, and no one has brought up anti-Catholicism except you.
If you want to address part of the story, how about addressing […]

It is rather bizarre to ask “a part of the story” to shut up and simply sit by and be commented on, but completely bizarre to then ask them to write on other topics presumably of interest to the commenter demanding silence.

Somehow I hear echos of someone dissatisfied at a concert because the lead act didn’t play “Freebird” long enough, or maybe voiced a political opinion that didn’t settle well.

By: Patrick

Patrick — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:09:32 +0000

Cyrus, shut up already. You’re part of the story not part of the commentariat, and no one has brought up anti-Catholicism except you.

If you want to address part of the story, how about addressing the other Overlawyered discussions about your history of abusive litigation and frivolous pleadings, and that Judge Kozinski is hardly the only judge to have dragged you over the coals for this misconduct.

By: Miss Havisham, bitter anti-bride

Miss Havisham, bitter anti-bride — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:35:44 +0000

correction to my comment: The “o” in order should be capitalized. That makes it a 101 course.

By: Miss Havisham, bitter anti-bride

Miss Havisham, bitter anti-bride — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:31:29 +0000

I’d like to see the LAT go after some of the real purveyors of the REAL pornography and snuff–those are not just some judges, lawyers…but they are people that are fiercely guarded because they know they have something to worry about. An actual crime!

A judge said this to me: One does not protest too much to a temporary restraining order if they haven’t done anything that would warrant a permanent one.