<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rob Lowe nanny lawsuits	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/06/rob-lowe-nanny-lawsuits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/06/rob-lowe-nanny-lawsuits/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 20:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Supremacy Claus		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/06/rob-lowe-nanny-lawsuits/comment-page-1/#comment-20739</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Supremacy Claus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 20:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7121#comment-20739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#039;t it be nice if Ted could support allowing Rob Lowe to sue Gloria Alred, despite his lack of privity? 

All he has are clearly enumerated duties of the lawyer to the adverse third parties in the Rules of Conduct, in the Rules of Evidence, and in the Rules of Civil Procedure, making any valid claim a per se claim (based on violation of a law). Only a common law good old boys agreement prevents him from enforcing the law against the lawyer immunized from any accountability for the damage they do to others by their carelessness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be nice if Ted could support allowing Rob Lowe to sue Gloria Alred, despite his lack of privity? </p>
<p>All he has are clearly enumerated duties of the lawyer to the adverse third parties in the Rules of Conduct, in the Rules of Evidence, and in the Rules of Civil Procedure, making any valid claim a per se claim (based on violation of a law). Only a common law good old boys agreement prevents him from enforcing the law against the lawyer immunized from any accountability for the damage they do to others by their carelessness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Frank		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/06/rob-lowe-nanny-lawsuits/comment-page-1/#comment-20712</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7121#comment-20712</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rob-lowe/household-betrayal_b_95472.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rob Lowe&#039;s statement&lt;/a&gt;.  Lowe is without recourse: California law permits lawyers to engage in such extortion, and the nanny is likely judgment-proof.  No telling how many celebrities pay off similar claims to avoid being dragged through the mud.  Wouldn&#039;t it be nice if such celebrities used those experiences to campaign for tort reform?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rob-lowe/household-betrayal_b_95472.html" rel="nofollow">Rob Lowe&#8217;s statement</a>.  Lowe is without recourse: California law permits lawyers to engage in such extortion, and the nanny is likely judgment-proof.  No telling how many celebrities pay off similar claims to avoid being dragged through the mud.  Wouldn&#8217;t it be nice if such celebrities used those experiences to campaign for tort reform?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
