<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The case against &#8220;Civil Gideon&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/06/the-case-against-civil-gideon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/06/the-case-against-civil-gideon/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:46:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Celia		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/06/the-case-against-civil-gideon/comment-page-1/#comment-22019</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Celia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7159#comment-22019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[“The talk was mistakenly interpreted as an attack on criminal Gideon itself.”

Unless you “extemporized” an awful lot, I cannot imagine how THIS talk could have been so mistakenly interpreted. 

I’m sorry the moderator didn’t ask you a slightly different version of the termination of parental rights question, viz what might be your position on government-provided counsel in cases where the court seeks to terminate parental rights?

I enjoyed your prepared remarks - sorry I missed the talk. Keep up the good
 work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The talk was mistakenly interpreted as an attack on criminal Gideon itself.”</p>
<p>Unless you “extemporized” an awful lot, I cannot imagine how THIS talk could have been so mistakenly interpreted. </p>
<p>I’m sorry the moderator didn’t ask you a slightly different version of the termination of parental rights question, viz what might be your position on government-provided counsel in cases where the court seeks to terminate parental rights?</p>
<p>I enjoyed your prepared remarks &#8211; sorry I missed the talk. Keep up the good<br />
 work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Deoxy		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/06/the-case-against-civil-gideon/comment-page-1/#comment-21999</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deoxy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7159#comment-21999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;the solution is to stop Child Protective Services&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The solution to many things is to stop CPS - they are at least as bad as the problems they are supposed to fix.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the solution is to stop Child Protective Services</p></blockquote>
<p>The solution to many things is to stop CPS &#8211; they are at least as bad as the problems they are supposed to fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
