Comments on: Thong shrapnel alleged in Victoria’s Secret suit

By: Nico

Nico — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:22:34 +0000

She actually looks pretty good for her age. Maybe she needs money for more “work” to be done…

By: Other Blogs

Other Blogs — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:11:46 +0000

[…] sartorial also resulted in a post on Overlawyered about a piece of thong shrapnel and a lawsult against Victoria’s Secret. Appropriate (or […]

By: Laurie

Laurie — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:10:18 +0000

I’m waiting for this to appear on Saturday Night Live

By: KDP

KDP — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:40:58 +0000

Shouldn’t there be an age limit for such an article of clothing?

By: Jim Collins

Jim Collins — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:12:00 +0000

Who wants to bet that Victoria’s Secret will put a label on their thongs stating that safety glasses should be used when donning this garment?

By: Peter

Peter — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:40:23 +0000

Just like I do not ski the black diamonds, this woman should not be messing with thongs, bejeweled or not!

By: Todd Rogers

Todd Rogers — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 11:03:05 +0000

Will the plaintiff be asked to try on the alleged shrapnel deployment apparatus, reminiscent of O.J. (and Sue Ellen Mischke) during a trial?

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:52:38 +0000

Obviously I don’t know if he was a lawyer anywhere else before California. With that said, according to the California bar website, Jason Buccat just got his license on 5/20 of this year which means he took the February bar. Apparently he was a bit too excited to find his first client.

By: Ken

Ken — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:31:57 +0000

As Dave Barry would say, “thong shrapnel” would be a great name for a band.