<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: July 15 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/july-15-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/july-15-roundup/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:54:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Julie Amero case ends		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/july-15-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-35228</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie Amero case ends]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7274#comment-35228</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] judge had overturned the conviction of the former Norwich, Ct. substitute teacher (Jul. 15, Mar. 14 and Jun. 10, 2007, etc.) over the episode in which her computer (almost certainly infected [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] judge had overturned the conviction of the former Norwich, Ct. substitute teacher (Jul. 15, Mar. 14 and Jun. 10, 2007, etc.) over the episode in which her computer (almost certainly infected [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Deoxy		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/july-15-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-24725</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deoxy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7274#comment-24725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Freedom of speech IS the freedom to offend.  &quot;freedom to speak anything which does not offend anyone&quot; is exactly identical to &quot;no freedom of speech at all&quot;, as anyone (such as the government) can just proclaim whatever topic to be &quot;offensive&quot;, and then you can&#039;t say it.

That&#039;s the whole, complete, and entire point of freedom of speech.  It has no other purpose.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freedom of speech IS the freedom to offend.  &#8220;freedom to speak anything which does not offend anyone&#8221; is exactly identical to &#8220;no freedom of speech at all&#8221;, as anyone (such as the government) can just proclaim whatever topic to be &#8220;offensive&#8221;, and then you can&#8217;t say it.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the whole, complete, and entire point of freedom of speech.  It has no other purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan Kellogg		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/july-15-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-24676</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Kellogg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7274#comment-24676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Norwich Ct. Case

The prosecutors are afraid of admitting error. They think that if they say they were wrong and correct their mistake, that they will lose any authority. What they&#039;re really doing is eroding what authority they have by showing they cannot be relied on to handle any affair honestly. Reputation counts for a lot in the legal community, and once you&#039;ve earned a reputation for dishonesty people will run riot over you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norwich Ct. Case</p>
<p>The prosecutors are afraid of admitting error. They think that if they say they were wrong and correct their mistake, that they will lose any authority. What they&#8217;re really doing is eroding what authority they have by showing they cannot be relied on to handle any affair honestly. Reputation counts for a lot in the legal community, and once you&#8217;ve earned a reputation for dishonesty people will run riot over you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
