<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Med-mal: Massachusetts adopts &#8220;loss of a chance&#8221; doctrine	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/med-mal-massachusetts-adopts-loss-of-a-chance-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/med-mal-massachusetts-adopts-loss-of-a-chance-doctrine/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:14:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron Miller		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/med-mal-massachusetts-adopts-loss-of-a-chance-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-27338</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7321#comment-27338</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As you know, I have read and written about this case: 

http://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/2008/07/lost_of_chance_in_medical_malp.html

I really think the logic of the case would certainly apply to any legal malpractice case. I would hate to be the defense lawyer arguing this does not apply in a legal malpractice case.  I think the argument is a dead loser. 

You cite a law review article suggesting that a law student sees it differently.  But when you read the actual article, you will find that he does not cite a single state where a court drew a distinction between loss of chance in a legal malpractice context and loss of chance in a medical malpractice context and said one was actionable and one was not.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know, I have read and written about this case: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/2008/07/lost_of_chance_in_medical_malp.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/2008/07/lost_of_chance_in_medical_malp.html</a></p>
<p>I really think the logic of the case would certainly apply to any legal malpractice case. I would hate to be the defense lawyer arguing this does not apply in a legal malpractice case.  I think the argument is a dead loser. </p>
<p>You cite a law review article suggesting that a law student sees it differently.  But when you read the actual article, you will find that he does not cite a single state where a court drew a distinction between loss of chance in a legal malpractice context and loss of chance in a medical malpractice context and said one was actionable and one was not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
