<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Problems with access to Overlawyered	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/problems-with-access-to-overlawyered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/problems-with-access-to-overlawyered/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 02:14:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Locked-out Overlawyered readers, in Australia and elsewhere		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/problems-with-access-to-overlawyered/comment-page-1/#comment-29840</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Locked-out Overlawyered readers, in Australia and elsewhere]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 02:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7322#comment-29840</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] quite a while I&#8217;ve been getting complaints that readers in other countries &#8212; Australia, in particular &#8212; are locked out of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] quite a while I&#8217;ve been getting complaints that readers in other countries &#8212; Australia, in particular &#8212; are locked out of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kimsch		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/problems-with-access-to-overlawyered/comment-page-1/#comment-25655</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kimsch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7322#comment-25655</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s a WP plugin called &lt;a href=&quot;http://txfx.net/code/wordpress/enforce-www-preference/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;enforce www preference.&lt;/a&gt; it provides 301 redirects to queries with /index.php and enforces your use or non-use of www. This also means that it doesn&#039;t matter what your readers put in the address bar... It&#039;s been working for me for quite some time. 

I &lt;strong&gt;haven&#039;t&lt;/strong&gt; had issues accessing your site.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a WP plugin called <a href="http://txfx.net/code/wordpress/enforce-www-preference/" rel="nofollow">enforce www preference.</a> it provides 301 redirects to queries with /index.php and enforces your use or non-use of www. This also means that it doesn&#8217;t matter what your readers put in the address bar&#8230; It&#8217;s been working for me for quite some time. </p>
<p>I <strong>haven&#8217;t</strong> had issues accessing your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pete Warden		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/problems-with-access-to-overlawyered/comment-page-1/#comment-25652</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete Warden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7322#comment-25652</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very strange. One thing to watch out for is that the canonical address for Overlawyered appears to be http://overlawyered.com/ rather than https://www.overlawyered.com/
If you go to the www prefixed version, it issues a &#039;permananent redirect&#039; that changes the URL in the address bar and directs the request there.

I was hoping that using the numeric IP address ( http://63.247.141.23/ ) might be a temporary solution, but it looks like your server is using virtual hosts and looking at the textual host name to work out what to return.

One possibility is that someone, somewhere in the pipeline is incorrectly caching pages between your server and the users. A quick test for that theory is to try adding a dummy &#039;?&#039; to the end of the URL, eg 
http://overlawyered.com/?

This question mark is ignored by your server, but bypasses any caches since they can&#039;t know that it isn&#039;t really a different page.

The LiveHTTPHeaders Firefox extension can be useful for debugging these sort of issues. If any of your readers are able to consistently reproduce the problem, and they&#039;re willing to install that extension, I&#039;m happy to talk them through the simple steps for gathering the information and look through the resulting logs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very strange. One thing to watch out for is that the canonical address for Overlawyered appears to be <a href="http://overlawyered.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://overlawyered.com/</a> rather than <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.overlawyered.com/</a><br />
If you go to the www prefixed version, it issues a &#8216;permananent redirect&#8217; that changes the URL in the address bar and directs the request there.</p>
<p>I was hoping that using the numeric IP address ( <a href="http://63.247.141.23/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://63.247.141.23/</a> ) might be a temporary solution, but it looks like your server is using virtual hosts and looking at the textual host name to work out what to return.</p>
<p>One possibility is that someone, somewhere in the pipeline is incorrectly caching pages between your server and the users. A quick test for that theory is to try adding a dummy &#8216;?&#8217; to the end of the URL, eg<br />
<a href="http://overlawyered.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://overlawyered.com/</a>?</p>
<p>This question mark is ignored by your server, but bypasses any caches since they can&#8217;t know that it isn&#8217;t really a different page.</p>
<p>The LiveHTTPHeaders Firefox extension can be useful for debugging these sort of issues. If any of your readers are able to consistently reproduce the problem, and they&#8217;re willing to install that extension, I&#8217;m happy to talk them through the simple steps for gathering the information and look through the resulting logs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Larry Sheldon		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/problems-with-access-to-overlawyered/comment-page-1/#comment-25651</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry Sheldon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7322#comment-25651</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Do they use a proxy server?  The same one?

If not, it is your server that does not like their Ip addresses.

If they do, it is the proxy server(s) issuing the rejection--probably on IP address.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do they use a proxy server?  The same one?</p>
<p>If not, it is your server that does not like their Ip addresses.</p>
<p>If they do, it is the proxy server(s) issuing the rejection&#8211;probably on IP address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
