<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;The Era of Big Punitive Damage Awards Is Not Over&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/the-era-of-big-punitive-damage-awards-is-not-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/the-era-of-big-punitive-damage-awards-is-not-over/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:25:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Inside Counsel magazine on punitive damages		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/the-era-of-big-punitive-damage-awards-is-not-over/comment-page-1/#comment-40730</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Inside Counsel magazine on punitive damages]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7253#comment-40730</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] because punitive damages were to be limited to intentional or particularly reprehensible conduct. As I feared a few months ago, the 1-to-1 ratio &#8220;ceiling&#8221; the Supreme Court suggested in Exxon Shipping v. Baker has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] because punitive damages were to be limited to intentional or particularly reprehensible conduct. As I feared a few months ago, the 1-to-1 ratio &#8220;ceiling&#8221; the Supreme Court suggested in Exxon Shipping v. Baker has [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fat, Juicy Punitive Damages For Trial Lawyers &#124; OpenMarket.org		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/07/the-era-of-big-punitive-damage-awards-is-not-over/comment-page-1/#comment-24323</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fat, Juicy Punitive Damages For Trial Lawyers &#124; OpenMarket.org]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7253#comment-24323</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] the Wall Street Journal just how feeble courts are at reining in excessive punitive damages awards, contrary to what you may have read about the Exxon Valdez case.  Thus, state tort reform laws limiting punitive damages remain necessary to restrain the whims [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the Wall Street Journal just how feeble courts are at reining in excessive punitive damages awards, contrary to what you may have read about the Exxon Valdez case.  Thus, state tort reform laws limiting punitive damages remain necessary to restrain the whims [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
