<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: When docs treat women as &#8220;pre-pregnant&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/08/when-docs-treat-women-as-pre-pregnant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/08/when-docs-treat-women-as-pre-pregnant/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:11:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted Frank		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/08/when-docs-treat-women-as-pre-pregnant/comment-page-1/#comment-28164</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7480#comment-28164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As &lt;a href=&quot;http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/28/do-doctors-view-women-as-pre-pregnant/#comment-102023&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one comment notes&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;I’m pretty sure the statute of limitations for malpractice suits on damage to children is a solid 18 years. Given that, is it a surprise that doctors are nervous about prescribing ANYTHING to a woman of child-bearing age? I say this both as a physician and a woman of child-bearing age who is well protected against pregnancy.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As <a href="http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/28/do-doctors-view-women-as-pre-pregnant/#comment-102023" rel="nofollow">one comment notes</a>, &#8220;I’m pretty sure the statute of limitations for malpractice suits on damage to children is a solid 18 years. Given that, is it a surprise that doctors are nervous about prescribing ANYTHING to a woman of child-bearing age? I say this both as a physician and a woman of child-bearing age who is well protected against pregnancy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
