<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Enron: class action lawyers set to get $688 million	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:15:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Coughlin Stoia, AmLaw Daily and Prof. John Coffee, cont&#8217;d		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/comment-page-1/#comment-28991</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coughlin Stoia, AmLaw Daily and Prof. John Coffee, cont&#8217;d]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7516#comment-28991</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] updating a Tuesday post, I expressed some annoyance that AmLaw Daily&#8217;s coverage of the $688 million Enron fee award extensively quoted Columbia [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] updating a Tuesday post, I expressed some annoyance that AmLaw Daily&#8217;s coverage of the $688 million Enron fee award extensively quoted Columbia [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Sneade		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/comment-page-1/#comment-28956</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sneade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7516#comment-28956</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s terrible that legal fees for these kinds of class action suits are still based on contingency fees. The panel of judges for these suits need to limit the fees to the customary hourly fees for legal representation. An hourly rate ($200-$400) is high but not usury as in the Enron class action. I have no connection to Enron, but the one suit I was a party to was much the same, on a smaller scale of course. The lawyers were paid millions while the participants in the suit received $79 each.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s terrible that legal fees for these kinds of class action suits are still based on contingency fees. The panel of judges for these suits need to limit the fees to the customary hourly fees for legal representation. An hourly rate ($200-$400) is high but not usury as in the Enron class action. I have no connection to Enron, but the one suit I was a party to was much the same, on a smaller scale of course. The lawyers were paid millions while the participants in the suit received $79 each.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Wisniewski		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/comment-page-1/#comment-28938</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Wisniewski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7516#comment-28938</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If my math is right, $688 million for a claimed 280,000 hours spent = an effective hourly rate of $2,428.57  Must be nice.  No, this isn&#039;t a &quot;windfall&quot;, no, not at all.  How does this not violate the rules of professional conduct that attorney fees must be &quot;reasonable&quot;?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If my math is right, $688 million for a claimed 280,000 hours spent = an effective hourly rate of $2,428.57  Must be nice.  No, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;windfall&#8221;, no, not at all.  How does this not violate the rules of professional conduct that attorney fees must be &#8220;reasonable&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/comment-page-1/#comment-28899</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Class Action Blogosphere Weekly Review &#171; ClassActionBlawg.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7516#comment-28899</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sad day		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/comment-page-1/#comment-28886</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sad day]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7516#comment-28886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll bet those SCOTUS clerks with their $275,000 to $300,000 signing bonuses (OT&#039;07) are wishing that they&#039;d become plaintiffs&#039; lawyers to collect this kind of bonus--it has to be easily in the tens-of-millions for the big partners.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll bet those SCOTUS clerks with their $275,000 to $300,000 signing bonuses (OT&#8217;07) are wishing that they&#8217;d become plaintiffs&#8217; lawyers to collect this kind of bonus&#8211;it has to be easily in the tens-of-millions for the big partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Deoxy		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/09/enron-class-action-lawyers-set-to-get-688-million/comment-page-1/#comment-28882</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deoxy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7516#comment-28882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That is only 10% - for a contingency fee, that&#039;s quite reasonalb e9these days).

Of course, the underlying claims are completely ridiculous, so it&#039;s still a travishamockery...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is only 10% &#8211; for a contingency fee, that&#8217;s quite reasonalb e9these days).</p>
<p>Of course, the underlying claims are completely ridiculous, so it&#8217;s still a travishamockery&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
