<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Nevada data encryption law	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/10/nevada-data-encryption-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/10/nevada-data-encryption-law/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:59:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Al Zoony		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/10/nevada-data-encryption-law/comment-page-1/#comment-33127</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Zoony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7683#comment-33127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello,
It is not a simple as just using PGP because there is a big problem exchanging Keys and there is also management of those keys. The only option is to buy products such as email encryption by Espion (www.espionint.com) or Postini which is now Google (http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/email.html)
. I personally prefer the espion interceptor not only because it is just a click away, but rather because it is an appliance which can be privately hosted and administered. The A. I. based spam option is also a nice complement and it is a one flat fee as opposed to per user charges which can be quite pricey.

What other solutions are out there that someone can recommend other than the Espion Interceptor? Something under $5000 would hit the spot. What would be recommended for a business of 10 people or less. I often look into solutions of this type but I find them to be aimed towards the large enterprise.

Good article,

Al Zoony]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
It is not a simple as just using PGP because there is a big problem exchanging Keys and there is also management of those keys. The only option is to buy products such as email encryption by Espion (www.espionint.com) or Postini which is now Google (<a href="http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/email.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/email.html</a>)<br />
. I personally prefer the espion interceptor not only because it is just a click away, but rather because it is an appliance which can be privately hosted and administered. The A. I. based spam option is also a nice complement and it is a one flat fee as opposed to per user charges which can be quite pricey.</p>
<p>What other solutions are out there that someone can recommend other than the Espion Interceptor? Something under $5000 would hit the spot. What would be recommended for a business of 10 people or less. I often look into solutions of this type but I find them to be aimed towards the large enterprise.</p>
<p>Good article,</p>
<p>Al Zoony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Deoxy		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/10/nevada-data-encryption-law/comment-page-1/#comment-31901</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deoxy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7683#comment-31901</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And the government shouldn&#039;t have imposed seat-belts either - they really don&#039;t have the right (at least, not the FEDs).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the government shouldn&#8217;t have imposed seat-belts either &#8211; they really don&#8217;t have the right (at least, not the FEDs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gary G		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/10/nevada-data-encryption-law/comment-page-1/#comment-31882</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7683#comment-31882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I do not see how this is something burdensome.  It is easy to do with PGP Freeware, Comodo, and Thawte.  The same argument was made with wearing seatbelts years ago.  It only takes an extra second or so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not see how this is something burdensome.  It is easy to do with PGP Freeware, Comodo, and Thawte.  The same argument was made with wearing seatbelts years ago.  It only takes an extra second or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
