<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ATRA&#8217;s &#8220;Judicial Hellholes 2008&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/atras-judicial-hellholes-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/atras-judicial-hellholes-2008/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:07:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Fighting Docs		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/atras-judicial-hellholes-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-37924</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fighting Docs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8021#comment-37924</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) report is flawed. 

ATRA&#039;s report indicates Pennsylvania has drastically improved. Nothing could be further from the truth. ATRA&#039;s report simply mirrors newspaper and press release fodder--not researched evidence. For example, the report only repeats what the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reports: the number of medical malpractice cases by year. But the Supreme Court only counts cases--not the number of Doctors and Hospitals and Others sued within those cases. 

The Pennsylvania Department of State shows far different numbers as it actually reports numbers of litigants within those cases--and the Department&#039;s numbers demonstrate that Pennsylvania still suffers from rampant lawsuit abuse.

Both sides--the trial lawyers, and the vicitims of lawsuit abuse have good reason to question ATRA&#039;s report.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Tort Reform Association (ATRA) report is flawed. </p>
<p>ATRA&#8217;s report indicates Pennsylvania has drastically improved. Nothing could be further from the truth. ATRA&#8217;s report simply mirrors newspaper and press release fodder&#8211;not researched evidence. For example, the report only repeats what the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reports: the number of medical malpractice cases by year. But the Supreme Court only counts cases&#8211;not the number of Doctors and Hospitals and Others sued within those cases. </p>
<p>The Pennsylvania Department of State shows far different numbers as it actually reports numbers of litigants within those cases&#8211;and the Department&#8217;s numbers demonstrate that Pennsylvania still suffers from rampant lawsuit abuse.</p>
<p>Both sides&#8211;the trial lawyers, and the vicitims of lawsuit abuse have good reason to question ATRA&#8217;s report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Laconic Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2008 &#8220;Judicial Hellholes&#8221; Announced		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/atras-judicial-hellholes-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-37173</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Laconic Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2008 &#8220;Judicial Hellholes&#8221; Announced]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8021#comment-37173</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] has the story here.  The original report is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] has the story here.  The original report is [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Barney		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/atras-judicial-hellholes-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-37052</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Barney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8021#comment-37052</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with VMS.  I&#039;ve handled claims and managed the arising litigation and would say that Bronx and Kings County (and Queens to a lesser extent) are certainly judicial hellholes.  New York County is more conservative in its awards, especially post-9/11.

I&#039;ve also had good luck (essentially as a defendant) in Nassau and Suffolk and other New York counties not noted in my first paragraph.  

Trust me, plaintiffs&#039; attorney gleefully point out in their negotiations that the case will be heard by such-and-such a jury pool (Bronx/Kings).  In other words:  good luck getting a rational non-demagogic argument to stick in a venue where the jurors simply want to stick it to the defendant.  

Trip over a sidewalk crack in Bronx and you&#039;ll get money...sometimes an obscene amount.  I&#039;ve seen it folks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with VMS.  I&#8217;ve handled claims and managed the arising litigation and would say that Bronx and Kings County (and Queens to a lesser extent) are certainly judicial hellholes.  New York County is more conservative in its awards, especially post-9/11.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also had good luck (essentially as a defendant) in Nassau and Suffolk and other New York counties not noted in my first paragraph.  </p>
<p>Trust me, plaintiffs&#8217; attorney gleefully point out in their negotiations that the case will be heard by such-and-such a jury pool (Bronx/Kings).  In other words:  good luck getting a rational non-demagogic argument to stick in a venue where the jurors simply want to stick it to the defendant.  </p>
<p>Trip over a sidewalk crack in Bronx and you&#8217;ll get money&#8230;sometimes an obscene amount.  I&#8217;ve seen it folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Walter Olson		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/atras-judicial-hellholes-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-37049</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walter Olson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8021#comment-37049</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You may be right. Long Island is perennially reported to have some of the nation&#039;s highest med-mal premiums, but I should not have jumped from that to the conclusion that the court system is slanted against the doctor-defendants. There might be other possible explanations for a high payout rate, such as high propensity to sue or high damages per case (because affluent patients sustain higher loss of income when incapacitated).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be right. Long Island is perennially reported to have some of the nation&#8217;s highest med-mal premiums, but I should not have jumped from that to the conclusion that the court system is slanted against the doctor-defendants. There might be other possible explanations for a high payout rate, such as high propensity to sue or high damages per case (because affluent patients sustain higher loss of income when incapacitated).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: VMS		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/atras-judicial-hellholes-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-37048</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VMS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8021#comment-37048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with Brooklyn and De Bronx, but Long Island? Nassau and Suffolk counties in New York are notoriously defendant friendly, and they are very stingy in their awards, especially in medmal suits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Brooklyn and De Bronx, but Long Island? Nassau and Suffolk counties in New York are notoriously defendant friendly, and they are very stingy in their awards, especially in medmal suits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
