<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Judge issues Rule 11 sanctions on camera infringement claim	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/judge-issues-rule-11-sanctions-on-camera-infringement-claim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/judge-issues-rule-11-sanctions-on-camera-infringement-claim/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: More patent litigation sanctions		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2008/12/judge-issues-rule-11-sanctions-on-camera-infringement-claim/comment-page-1/#comment-36535</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[More patent litigation sanctions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=7974#comment-36535</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] trend? Following up on yesterday&#8217;s post about the camera and Medtronic cases: &#8220;A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] trend? Following up on yesterday&#8217;s post about the camera and Medtronic cases: &#8220;A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
