<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: January 12 roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/01/january-12-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/01/january-12-roundup/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 02:19:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chicago: $260 million in public borrowing&#8230;		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/01/january-12-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-38906</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chicago: $260 million in public borrowing&#8230;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8248#comment-38906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8230;just to pay Cook County&#8217;s outlays on lawsuits and settlements? Earlier here. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] &#8230;just to pay Cook County&#8217;s outlays on lawsuits and settlements? Earlier here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Childs		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/01/january-12-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-38703</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Childs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8248#comment-38703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As I noted in my blog comments as well, they didn&#039;t seek millions of dollars.  At trial they requested $100,000 and one plaintiff alleged physical injury, though he conceded on cross-examination that his injury might have been psychosomatic.

A fair number of states permit recovery for emotional distress in such a setting, too, though I don&#039;t know about Vermont.

Again, not the strongest case in the world, and the court dismissed the case, but not on a conclusion that they didn&#039;t receive &quot;something other than chicken meat,&quot; but that they failed to carry the burden of showing harm.  Since they were proceeding pro se, that&#039;s not particularly shocking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I noted in my blog comments as well, they didn&#8217;t seek millions of dollars.  At trial they requested $100,000 and one plaintiff alleged physical injury, though he conceded on cross-examination that his injury might have been psychosomatic.</p>
<p>A fair number of states permit recovery for emotional distress in such a setting, too, though I don&#8217;t know about Vermont.</p>
<p>Again, not the strongest case in the world, and the court dismissed the case, but not on a conclusion that they didn&#8217;t receive &#8220;something other than chicken meat,&#8221; but that they failed to carry the burden of showing harm.  Since they were proceeding pro se, that&#8217;s not particularly shocking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Neal		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/01/january-12-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-38701</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8248#comment-38701</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, you are missing something.  Seeking millions of dollars of damages from emotional distress (no physical injury) from seeing chicken entrails smells like chicken entrails to me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are missing something.  Seeking millions of dollars of damages from emotional distress (no physical injury) from seeing chicken entrails smells like chicken entrails to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Childs		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2009/01/january-12-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-38591</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Childs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/?p=8248#comment-38591</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Am I missing something on that Marler post?  He doesn&#039;t seem to actually say anything that&#039;s wrong with the prisoners&#039; case.  Just says it makes him cringe and then pastes in the entire story.  Not the greatest case ever, but nothing obviously egregious about it either, from the facts as recited.  It&#039;s not up there with most of the others under your &quot;prisoners&quot; tag, is it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I missing something on that Marler post?  He doesn&#8217;t seem to actually say anything that&#8217;s wrong with the prisoners&#8217; case.  Just says it makes him cringe and then pastes in the entire story.  Not the greatest case ever, but nothing obviously egregious about it either, from the facts as recited.  It&#8217;s not up there with most of the others under your &#8220;prisoners&#8221; tag, is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
